Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pongo Twistleton's avatar

"The complaint is that the Dodgers make more and try harder and work smarter and care more."

Oh come on with this. They have a ridiculous advantage over every other team, with $8 billion in TV revenue-- and they don't have to share as much of that revenue as other teams do:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/maurybrown/2026/01/26/mlb-didnt-cut-the-dodgers-a-6-billion-revenue-sharing-shelter-bankruptcy-court-did/

They care more and try harder and work smarter because their previous owner had an ugly divorce? They have a huge financial advantage that they are exploiting to the maximum every year.

They shouldn't be treated as some admirable group that just enjoys winning-- their massively wealthy owners, Guggenheim Partners, are doing what billionaires to do exploit the rules for their own maximum advantage and profit.

Their estimated savings from this dumb loophole alone are expected to be about $2 billion, which is more than the estimated net worth of Hal Steinbrenner, and more than several other team owners.

Curtis's avatar

For the Brewers fan, I totally agree that they have as good a chance as any to beat the Dodgers or anybody else in a short series. But even more broadly, if you can enjoy a game or a season unless your team is the championship favorites, then sports may not be your thing. Intensity might be different, of course, based on the team's performance. But if you can't enjoy the ebb and flow of an individual game or can't find a player, it's rough. I spent a lot of evenings during my teenage years watching Joe Randa play third base for some epically bad Royals teams. But the ballpark was fun, and Joe played with such class and effort, and it was usually a great way to spend a night. Life is more enjoyable if it isn't championship or pointless.

164 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?