Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Craig DeLucia's avatar

Logical inconsistencies bother me... so Joe, I'm troubled that for all of your disdain of the "unwritten rules," you're suggesting an unwritten rule that the manager shouldn't make certain decisions when personal milestones are on the line. And that baffles me. Where do you draw the line? Is it just 3000 hits / 500 homers? You play to win the game and the manager has to employ the strategy that they believe best accomplishes that goal.

I can't stand the intentional walk but it's not a terrible or unorthodox strategy in that situation absent the personal milestone. It's not like he walked Miggy with two outs and the bases empty. His team can't hit and they have a one run deficit. They have to play to win the game.

I think too many folks are letting their distaste of the IBB (which I share) seep into whether what Boone did was an abomination and disrespect of the game (it was not).

tmutchell's avatar

Two HUGE problems with this take:

1. The Yankees are trying to win. As someone else pointed out: you can't whine about baseball's unwritten rules somehow going against teams trying to actually win and then a week later, also whine about a team not doing its best to entertain the fans regardless of the outcome of the game.

B. The Paige-Gibson intentional walks story is total BS:

https://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/2012/02/1942-negro-world-series-two-legends-face-off.html

Paige never walked anybody in that game. I know Buck O'Neil was your friend, and he sounds like an awesome guy, but the story appears to be a complete fabrication, apparently by Paige himself, initially in his own 1948 autobiography, two years after Gibson had died.

Besides that, the 1942 Negro League World Series was more like an exhibition than what we now think of as "official" games. It was the first time they had done a Negro League World Series since 1924, and to try to drum up support for continuing the practice, they played the games in various parks in NY, Philly, Pittsburgh and Washington, not in the teams' home parks.

Plus they played exhibition games in between, including some against each other, and even signed new players away from other teams to compete in the series, something that would never happen now. So even if it had happened, it would have been with more of an eye to publicity for the World Series than to any particular game outcome, which again, is simply not how it's done anymore.

As far as Boone's "using general data", well, sure, the difference in general between having a RH hitter up with men on 2nd and 3rd and a LH batter up with the bases loaded. But these were not general players. These were specific players in a specific situation. Consider:

Luetge has been great for the Yankees since last year, a different pitcher from the guy who was a mediocre LOOGy in parts of four Mariners seasons starting a decade ago. But he still had significant platoon splits in 2021:

vs. LHB: .196/.204/.315

vs. RHB: .259/.319/.381

Still good against RHB, but almost lights-out against lefties.

Miggy is not the Miggy of old - well, than *that* kinda "of old" anyway. Now he's just Old Miggy. And Old Miggy has had significant platoon splits over the last five seasons:

vs. LHP: .312/.399/.465

vs. RHP: .251/.317/.382

Admittedly, his 2021 splits were much closer than that, though still with a slightly better chance of getting a hit or walk against a LHP.

Austin Meadows, meanwhile, was all but helpless against LHP last season:

vs. LHP: .198/.270/.293

vs. RHP: .251/.336/.536

I ignored this year's platoon splits because the sample size is too small to be meaningful yet.

Overall, when you've got a pitcher who's much better against lefties - and also who must keep pitching because he has only faced one batter so far, and a choice of a hitter who is, while largely inept, better against lefties, or a hitter who, while largely decent, tends to suck against lefties, you let the lefty pitcher face the guy who usually sucks against lefties. And if he gets a hit you tip your cap.

I know it's nice to wax poetic about what should have been based on what would have been more entertaining for us as fans, but these guys have a lot of money at stake here. They do not get paid based on whether or not we find a particular moment entertaining. When they go into contract negotiations, they get paid based on outcomes, and walking Miggy in that spot gave Boone the best chance at a positive outcome for his team.

Let someone else serve up Miggy's 3000th hit. That's not Boone's job.

120 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?