Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike's avatar

"On Friday, the Mets threw their second-ever no-hitter and, I don’t mean to sound rude about it … but who cares?"

Mets fan here. I care. Watched the last 6 1/2 innings with my 12-year old son. We had a blast. It was wonderful. I knew it's "not the same thing," but, you know what? We loved it.

(Meanwhile, I had to wait 40 years for this shit, and he gets it within, what, his first 7 or 8 years? Kids these days, man. Never earning it.)

tmutchell's avatar

Here's a fun antithesis to those preposterously hard-throwing young pitchers: an old pitcher who still manages to get outs without, well, "stuff".

Zack Greinke, after pitching 6 innings of one-run ball (and losing, of course) today, currently has just 7 strikeouts in 28 innings pitched in 2022.

I thought it was a typo the first time I saw it. But nope.

And he's been good. Like, really good. His 2.57 ERA is in the top 10 in the AL. He's 0-2 because he for some reason decided to sign with the Royals in the offseason, but he's pitched pretty well.

Nobody else in MLB is close to that paltry 2.25 K/9 rate. The next closest is Cal Quantrill, who has 10 Ks in 22 IP.

Nobody has had a K rate this low in a full season since 2004, when Kirk Reuter did it for the Giants, and you hafta go back another decade to find a pitcher with a K rate this low who qualified for the ERA title and had a better than average ERA. Ricky Bones did that in 1994.

Anyway, my guess is that Greinke figured out sooner than most that this new baseball was not going to fly like the ones from previous years and he adjusted his pitching approach to maximize his energies. He's allowed only 3 walks and one homer all year too, doing his best to maximize soft contact, I suppose. should be fun to watch if he can keep it up.

Would be even more fun if the Royals could score a few runs for him once in a while.

29 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?