Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Llarry's avatar

(Mind you, I'm a life-long Steelers fan...)

You say Baker is not the guy to take you to a Super Bowl. I say, give him an offense that actually uses his strengths consistently, (and gives you a lot of Nick Chubb in order to avoid Baker's weaknesses), and I'll take Baker over Trent Dilfer any time.

I live in Arizona, and I watched Jake Plummer take ASU to the Rose Bowl with the National Championship on the line. I watched the Cardinals draft him, and then fail to get the most out of him, then have him go to Denver, and the same thing happen. Jake was best when he was acting, not thinking. Especially rolling out *against* the flow. (Best thrower from the off-hand side I've ever seen.). But nobody would build an offense around those skills. They kept trying to make him work in a standard offense.

That's where Baker is. He can do some fine things, if you let him, but don't force him to do it all the "right" way. Keep him on the move, and use the run game so that he doesn't have to try and win the game all by himself.

Curtis's avatar

The Browns have come a long way in the Mayfield era. They have gone from an embarrassment to a good team. But it is much harder to go from a good team to a contending team than it is from bad to good. Stefanski looked good in year 1 because it was almost impossible to look worse than the last guy or the guy before that. But now he is compared with Tomlin, Harbaugh, Reid, Belichick and the guys he is actually competing with. Mayfield used to be compared to Kiser, Quinn, Hoyer crew that had been leading the Browns for years; now he is compared with Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, Herbert. And both of those lists are just inside the conference.

As frustrating as it is to watch, though, this is progress. The ghosts of the last 20 years can go away and the team evaluated against its peers. Success will be more difficult, but much more rewarding.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?