Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Burnell's avatar

Baseball ownership seems to have an institutional memory that *still* resents losing the benefits of the Reserve Clause 45 years ago. The MLBPA is, by far, the most powerful player union in sports, and as such, they have reaped the greatest benefits of a somewhat free market (ie. paid something close to their actual market value). A couple of owners embraced the change, but, most of ownership spent the next two decades fighting an unsuccessful full-frontal assault on the MLBPA, failing miserably each time. Since then? They've fought and won some skirmishes at the margins. We're probably all seamheads to one degree or another here, so, I know, I re-hashing old news. What has struck me over the years since Peter Seitz set the players free, is how much time and effort ownership has put into talking their sport down, from "big market - small market" talk to the threats of contraction. I cannot fathom how an industry can thrive when the people who should be its greatest proponents spend so much time bad-mouthing their product.

Dave's avatar

Posnanski for Commissioner! I loved your ideas to goose baseball’s image during the downtime.

Baseball, because of its history, had a head start but they blew it

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?